<question>Israel x Hamas ceasefire by July 15?</question>

<date> 2025-06-29 </date>

## Fact Bank

*   As of June 29, 2025, Israeli officials are tempering expectations for a Gaza deal, stating that Israel has agreed to a US envoy's proposal, but Hamas is holding up a deal. (Source: [Times of Israel](https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-officials-temper-expectations-for-gaza-deal-amid-heavy-us-pressure/))
*   A previous ceasefire agreement, the "2025 Gaza War Ceasefire," was sealed on January 15, 2025, went into effect on January 19, 2025, and expired on March 18, 2025. It involved multi-stage hostage and prisoner exchanges. (Source: [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Gaza_war_ceasefire))
*   On June 23, 2025, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, which Iranian state media confirmed, but attacks continued from both sides despite the announcement. (Source: [CNN](https://www.cnn.com/world/live-news/israel-iran-us-strikes-06-23-25-intl-hnk))
*   As of June 29, 2025, Israeli forces killed at least 72 people in Gaza, including children and aid seekers. The humanitarian situation is dire, with nearly 600 Palestinians killed seeking food at aid centers. (Source: [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/29/live-israel-kills-60-in-gaza-claims-senior-hamas-official-among-dead))
*   Egypt is reportedly working on a proposal for a 60-day truce in exchange for the release of some Israeli captives and increased humanitarian aid to Gaza. This proposal is a joint effort by Egypt, Qatar, and the US. (Source: [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/29/live-israel-kills-60-in-gaza-claims-senior-hamas-official-among-dead))
*   A senior Israeli official stated on June 29, 2025, that there has been no significant change in the fundamental positions of either Israel or Hamas, particularly regarding Hamas's demand for guarantees of a permanent end to the war. (Source: [Jerusalem Post](https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-859308))
*   Prime Minister Netanyahu held a meeting on the hostage issue on June 28 and plans another on June 30. Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer will travel to Washington on July 1 to meet with White House envoy Steve Witkoff, who leads US efforts to broker a ceasefire. (Source: [Jerusalem Post](https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-859308))
*   US President Trump stated on June 27, 2025, that he believes a ceasefire in Gaza could be reached "within the next week." (Source: [CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-gaza-israel-hamas-ceasefire-possible-next-week/))
*   Historically, ceasefires between Israel and Hamas have been brokered by Egypt, Qatar, and/or the U.S., and have often involved economic concessions from Israel for calm. However, the current conflict (post-October 2023) differs, with Israel rejecting a ceasefire until Hamas is defeated. (Source: [Israel Policy Forum PDF](https://israelpolicyforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A-Brief-History-of-Israel-Hamas-Ceasefire-Agreements.pdf))
*   Hamas faces internal challenges and uncertainty over Iranian support, which some analysts suggest could make a ceasefire more likely. (Source: [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/battling-survive-hamas-faces-defiant-clans-doubts-over-iran-2025-06-27/))
*   The humanitarian situation in Gaza, with widespread casualties and aid restrictions, continues to be a major factor in negotiations, with international pressure for increased aid. (Source: [UNRWA](https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/unrwa-situation-report-176-situation-gaza-strip-and-west-bank-including-east-jerusalem), [OCHA oPt](https://www.ochaopt.org/content/gaza-humanitarian-response-update-8-21-june-2025), [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/29/live-israel-kills-60-in-gaza-claims-senior-hamas-official-among-dead))
*   A Hamas official told Reuters that the group had informed mediators it was ready to resume ceasefire talks, but reaffirmed the group's demands. (Source: [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-orders-evacuations-northern-gaza-trump-calls-war-end-2025-06-29/))

## Reasoning Matrix

| Claim | Direction (+/-) | Strength (1-5) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Pro-Ceasefire** | | | |
| Egypt, Qatar, and US actively mediating a 60-day truce proposal. | + | 4 | [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/29/live-israel-kills-60-in-gaza-claims-senior-hamas-official-among-dead) |
| US President Trump believes a ceasefire is possible "within the next week." | + | 3 | [CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-gaza-israel-hamas-ceasefire-possible-next-week/) |
| Hamas has informed mediators it is ready to resume ceasefire talks. | + | 3 | [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-orders-evacuations-northern-gaza-trump-calls-war-end-2025-06-29/) |
| Dire humanitarian situation in Gaza creates international pressure for a ceasefire and increased aid. | + | 4 | [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/29/live-israel-kills-60-in-gaza-claims-senior-hamas-official-among-dead), [UNRWA](https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/unrwa-situation-report-176-situation-gaza-strip-and-west-bank-including-east-jerusalem) |
| Hamas faces internal challenges and uncertainty over Iranian support, potentially increasing their willingness to negotiate. | + | 2 | [Reuters](https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/battling-survive-hamas-faces-defiant-clans-doubts-over-iran-2025-06-27/) |
| **Con-Ceasefire** | | | |
| Israeli officials are tempering expectations, stating Hamas is holding up a deal. | - | 4 | [Times of Israel](https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-officials-temper-expectations-for-gaza-deal-amid-heavy-us-pressure/) |
| No significant change in fundamental positions of Israel or Hamas, especially regarding Hamas's demand for a permanent end to the war. | - | 5 | [Jerusalem Post](https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/defense-news/article-859308) |
| Israel's stated goal is to defeat Hamas, a departure from previous ceasefire conditions. | - | 5 | [Israel Policy Forum PDF](https://israelpolicyforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A-Brief-History-of-Israel-Hamas-Ceasefire-Agreements.pdf) |
| Previous 2025 ceasefire (Jan 19 - Mar 18) expired, indicating fragility of agreements. | - | 3 | [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Gaza_war_ceasefire) |
| Continued Israeli military operations and casualties in Gaza despite ongoing talks. | - | 4 | [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/6/29/live-israel-kills-60-in-gaza-claims-senior-hamas-official-among-dead) |

## Synthesis and Analysis

The prospect of an Israel-Hamas ceasefire by July 15, 2025, is characterized by a complex interplay of conflicting pressures and entrenched positions. While there is significant international mediation and humanitarian urgency pushing for a truce, the core demands of both sides remain largely irreconcilable within the given timeframe.

On the one hand, the ongoing mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar, and the US, coupled with the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, create strong external pressure for a ceasefire. The reported 60-day truce proposal and Hamas's stated readiness to resume talks indicate a channel for negotiation exists. US President Trump's public optimism, while potentially a political statement, also adds a layer of perceived momentum. Furthermore, internal challenges within Hamas, such as potential doubts over Iranian support and defiance from clans, could theoretically make them more amenable to a deal.

However, the most significant obstacle is the fundamental disagreement on the war's ultimate objective. Israel's stated goal of defeating Hamas, a departure from previous ceasefire conditions, directly clashes with Hamas's demand for a permanent end to the war. Senior Israeli officials explicitly temper expectations, asserting that Hamas is holding up a deal due to these core demands. The recent expiration of a previous 2025 ceasefire (January 19 - March 18) underscores the fragility and temporary nature of past agreements, suggesting that even if a short-term truce is achieved, a lasting ceasefire by July 15 is highly improbable given the current stated positions.

The continued Israeli military operations and casualties in Gaza, despite ongoing talks, further highlight the lack of a de-escalation commitment necessary for a rapid ceasefire. While humanitarian concerns are pressing, they have not, to date, overridden the strategic objectives of either party.

**Critical Uncertainty:** The primary critical uncertainty is whether either Israel or Hamas will significantly alter their fundamental demands regarding the war's conclusion and the future governance of Gaza within the next two weeks. Without such a shift, any agreement is likely to be a temporary truce rather than a comprehensive ceasefire.

## Key Assumptions

| Assumption | Impact if Proven Wrong (>= 10% shift) |
|---|---|
| 1. Hamas significantly softens its demand for a permanent end to the war and agrees to a temporary truce without such guarantees. | Increases probability of ceasefire. |
| 2. Israel agrees to a ceasefire without achieving its stated objective of dismantling Hamas, perhaps due to overwhelming international pressure or a major hostage release. | Increases probability of ceasefire. |
| 3. Mediators introduce a new, highly compelling proposal that addresses core concerns of both sides in a novel way. | Increases probability of ceasefire. |
| 4. A major, unforeseen external event (e.g., significant regional escalation or de-escalation) drastically alters the strategic calculus of either party. | Shifts probability in either direction depending on the event. |
| 5. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza reaches an unprecedented level, forcing an immediate, albeit temporary, cessation of hostilities. | Increases probability of ceasefire. |

## Calibration and Probability

**a. Initial Probability:** 0.15

**b. Calibration Reflection:**

*   **Base-rate sanity:** Historically, Israel-Hamas ceasefires have been difficult to achieve and often short-lived, especially when core demands are not met. The current conflict is also described as a departure from previous cycles, with Israel's stated goal of dismantling Hamas. This suggests a low base rate for a comprehensive ceasefire in such a short timeframe, especially one that addresses the underlying issues. My initial probability of 15% aligns with a low base rate, acknowledging the difficulty but not ruling out the possibility entirely given the active mediation.

*   **Tail-probability sanity:** A 15% probability is not an extreme tail probability. It reflects that while a ceasefire is unlikely given the current impasse, it's not impossible. The active mediation and humanitarian crisis provide some non-zero chance of a breakthrough, even if temporary. It avoids being overly optimistic (e.g., 50%+) or overly pessimistic (e.g., <1%) given the dynamic nature of the conflict and ongoing diplomatic efforts.

*   **Over/under-confidence check:** I have considered both pro and con factors, giving more weight to the fundamental disagreements and Israel's stated objectives, which appear to be the primary impediments. The short timeframe also significantly reduces the likelihood of a complex agreement being reached and implemented. I feel confident that 15% accurately reflects the balance of evidence, leaning towards unlikelihood but acknowledging the ongoing efforts and potential for unforeseen shifts.

**c. Final Probability:** <answer>0.15</answer>



<question>Will any rationalist, effective altruist, or AI safety researcher go on the Joe Rogan Experience before 2026?</question>

<date>2025-04-11</date>

## 1. Fact Bank

*   A Bloomberg analysis of 91 JRE episodes with over 1 million views between Nov 2022 and Nov 2024 found that the following topics were discussed: transgender identity (53%), immigration (42%), institutional medicine (64%), economy (34%), war (55%), and voting and elections (59%). ([Source](https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/))
*   The same Bloomberg analysis provides a link to a GitHub repository with the raw data on guests, which could provide a more detailed breakdown of guest types. ([Source](https://github.com/BloombergGraphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/blob/main/data/table_guests_by_channel.csv))
*   Lex Fridman, a podcaster sometimes associated with the rationalist community, was included in the Bloomberg analysis, indicating that figures from these communities are within the orbit of major podcasters. ([Source](https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/))
*   The Bloomberg article notes that Joe Rogan has hosted guests who have spread debunked theories, which could be a deterrent for some potential guests from the rationalist, EA, or AI safety communities. ([Source](https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/))
*   A review of a partial guest list from the Bloomberg analysis shows that JRE has hosted numerous guests categorized as "Intellectuals," including Neil deGrasse Tyson, Andrew Huberman, and others. ([Source](https://github.com/BloombergGraphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/blob/main/data/table_guests_by_channel.csv))
*   Joe Rogan has shown a clear interest in AI and related topics, having hosted multiple episodes with guests like Marc Andreessen, Sam Altman, and Nick Bostrom, where they discussed the implications of AI on society, politics, and warfare. ([Source](https://jre.ai/episodes/2234-marc-andreessen))
*   Eliezer Yudkowsky, a key figure in the rationalist and AI safety communities, has participated in long-form podcast discussions, indicating a willingness to engage with this type of media. ([Source](https://www.dwarkesh.com/p/eliezer-yudkowsky))
*   Scott Alexander, another key figure in the rationalist community, is known for his privacy and avoidance of publicity, making him an unlikely candidate for a high-profile podcast like JRE. ([Source](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/slate-star-codex-and-silicon-valleys-war-against-the-media))
*   Will MacAskill, a leading figure in the effective altruism movement, is a public intellectual with a significant media presence, including a TED talk, profiles in major publications, and a past appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience (episode #930). ([Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buyBzK5yM-s))
*   Toby Ord, another influential figure in effective altruism and the author of "The Precipice," a book on existential risk, has also engaged in long-form podcast interviews, making him another plausible JRE guest. ([Source](https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/toby-ord-perils-of-maximising-good/))
*   Holden Karnofsky, a co-founder of GiveWell and Open Philanthropy, has also participated in long-form podcast interviews and has written about the importance of media attention, making him another plausible, albeit less public, JRE guest. ([Source](https://80000hours.org/podcast/episodes/holden-karnofsky-most-important-century/))
*   There is a significant online movement and discussion advocating for Eliezer Yudkowsky to appear on JRE, including a "Meme Eliezer Onto The Joe Rogan Experience" campaign on Twitter, indicating strong interest from his followers and the broader community. ([Source](https://twitter.com/MasterTimBlais/status/1632817953870577664))
*   Nick Bostrom, a leading AI safety researcher, has appeared on JRE (episode #1350), further demonstrating the podcast's interest in these topics. ([Source](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5c4cv7rVlE8))

## 2. Reasoning Matrix

| Claim                                                                                             | Direction | Strength (1-5) | Source                                                                                                                            |
| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Joe Rogan has a history of hosting guests from the intellectual/academic world.                   | +         | 5              | [Bloomberg JRE Analysis](https://github.com/BloombergGraphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/blob/main/data/table_guests_by_channel.csv) |
| Joe Rogan has a demonstrated interest in AI and existential risk.                                 | +         | 5              | [JRE Episode with Marc Andreessen](https://jre.ai/episodes/2234-marc-andreessen)                                                     |
| Will MacAskill and Nick Bostrom, prominent figures in EA and AI safety, have already been on JRE. | +         | 5              | [JRE Episode with Will MacAskill](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buyBzK5yM-s)                                                     |
| There is a strong online push for Eliezer Yudkowsky to appear on JRE.                             | +         | 4              | [Twitter Campaign](https://twitter.com/MasterTimBlais/status/1632817953870577664)                                                   |
| Scott Alexander, a key rationalist figure, is highly private and unlikely to appear.              | -         | 4              | [New Yorker Article](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-inquiry/slate-star-codex-and-silicon-valleys-war-against-the-media)     |
| The controversial nature of JRE may deter some potential guests.                                  | -         | 3              | [Bloomberg JRE Analysis](https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/)                                    |
| The pool of high-profile, media-savvy individuals in these communities is relatively small.       | -         | 2              | Inferred from research                                                                                                            |

## 3. Synthesis and Analysis

The evidence strongly suggests that a rationalist, effective altruist, or AI safety researcher is likely to appear on the Joe Rogan Experience before 2026. The most compelling piece of evidence is that two prominent figures from these communities, Will MacAskill and Nick Bostrom, have already been guests on the show. This establishes a clear precedent and demonstrates Joe Rogan's interest in these topics and his willingness to host individuals from these intellectual circles.

Furthermore, there is a significant and vocal online movement pushing for Eliezer Yudkowsky, a leading figure in the AI safety community, to appear on JRE. This public pressure, combined with Yudkowsky's own willingness to engage in long-form podcast discussions, makes him a very strong candidate for a future appearance.

While some figures in the rationalist community, such as Scott Alexander, are highly private and unlikely to appear on a platform like JRE, there are many other public-facing intellectuals in these movements who would likely be open to the opportunity. The potential for reaching a massive and diverse audience on JRE is a significant draw for individuals and movements that are trying to spread their ideas.

The main counterargument is that the controversial nature of JRE might deter some potential guests. However, the fact that MacAskill and Bostrom have already appeared on the show suggests that this is not a deal-breaker for everyone. The potential benefits of reaching Rogan's audience seem to outweigh the risks for at least some individuals in these communities.

Overall, the combination of past appearances, public demand, and a pool of media-savvy potential guests makes it highly probable that another individual from these communities will appear on JRE before 2026.

## 4. Key Assumptions

| Assumption                                                                              | Impact on Forecast (if wrong) |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- |
| Joe Rogan will continue to host long-form interviews with intellectuals and experts.    | -20%                          |
| The online pressure for Eliezer Yudkowsky to appear on JRE will continue or increase.   | -15%                          |
| The rationalist, EA, and AI safety communities will continue to have public-facing      | -10%                          |
| figures who are willing to engage with mainstream media.                                |                               |
| The controversy surrounding JRE will not significantly worsen to the point where it     | -10%                          |
| becomes untenable for any credible academic or researcher to appear on the show.        |                               |

## 5. Initial Probability

My initial probability is 0.85.

## 6. Calibration Reflection

*   **Base-rate sanity:** Joe Rogan has hosted thousands of guests. The number of guests from these specific communities is very small in comparison. However, his interest in AI and related topics is a strong signal that he is actively seeking out guests from this area. The base rate of "intellectual" guests is quite high, and these individuals fit that category. I will adjust my probability down slightly to account for the low overall base rate of guests from these specific communities. Adjustment: -0.05.

*   **Tail-probability sanity:** Could I be wrong? Yes. A major scandal or a shift in Rogan's format could make this less likely. The key figures in these communities could also decide that JRE is not the right platform for them. However, given the strong momentum and the precedent that has been set, a probability of 0.20 or lower seems too low. A probability of 0.95 or higher seems too high, as there is still a degree of uncertainty. I am comfortable with the current probability. No adjustment.

*   **Over/under-confidence check:** I have based my forecast on a wide range of evidence, including past guest appearances, public statements, and online discussions. I have also considered the counterarguments. I believe my confidence level is appropriate. No adjustment.

## 7. Final Probability

<answer>0.80</answer>


<question>What's the probability that xAI has the best AI model in the world end of July? This question will resolve according to the company which owns the model which has the highest arena score based off the Chatbot Arena LLM Leaderboard (https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) when the table under the "Leaderboard" tab is checked on July 31, 2025, 12:00 PM ET.</question>

<date>2025-07-10</date>

## Fact Bank
* The Chatbot Arena Leaderboard, as of July 7, 2025, is led by Google's Gemini-2.5-Pro with an Elo rating of 1477. (https://openlm.ai/chatbot-arena/)
* xAI's Grok-3-Preview-02-24 is a strong contender with an Elo of 1422 and a high MMLU score of 92.7. (https://openlm.ai/chatbot-arena/)
* xAI has secured significant funding, with a recent $10 billion round bringing their total to around $17 billion. (https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/01/elon-musk-xai-raises-10-billion-in-debt-and-equity.html)
* xAI has released Grok 3 and is working on Grok 4, aiming to challenge OpenAI. (https://x.ai/)
* Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro is the current leader, and there are rumors of a Gemini 3.0 release in late 2025. (https://felloai.com/2025/06/googles-gemini-3-0-here-is-all-we-know-and-what-to-expect/)
* OpenAI's GPT-4o is a top-ranked model, and GPT-5 is expected to be released in the summer of 2025. (https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/artificial-intelligence/openais-sam-altman-discusses-gpt-5-release-date/)
* Anthropic has released Claude 4, with Opus 4 being a top performer, especially in coding. (https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-4)
* Meta AI released Llama 4 in April 2025, with a focus on multimodal capabilities. (https://ai.meta.com/blog/llama-4-multimodal-intelligence/)
* DeepSeek, a Chinese company, has produced a highly-ranked open-source model with a surprisingly low budget. (https://www.forbes.com/sites/markminevich/2025/02/06/the-6-million-ai-bombshell-how-deepseek-shook-wall-street-and-ai-leadership/)
* The major AI labs are in a fierce competition for talent, with significant poaching of researchers between companies. (https://www.reuters.com/business/zuckerbergs-meta-superintelligence-labs-poaches-top-ai-talent-silicon-valley-2025-07-08/)

## Reasoning Matrix
| Claim | Direction (+/-) | Strength (1-5) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| xAI's rapid progress and significant funding give it a strong chance of developing a top-tier model. | + | 4 | https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/01/elon-musk-xai-raises-10-billion-in-debt-and-equity.html |
| Elon Musk's leadership and access to data from X (formerly Twitter) could provide a unique advantage. | + | 3 | N/A (Inference) |
| The release of Grok 4 could be a significant leap forward, potentially surpassing competitors. | + | 4 | https://decrypt.co/329451/elon-musks-xai-launches-remarkable-terrifying-grok-4-model |
| Google's current lead with Gemini 2.5 Pro demonstrates their strong research and development capabilities. | - | 5 | https://openlm.ai/chatbot-arena/ |
| OpenAI has a track record of releasing state-of-the-art models and GPT-5 is highly anticipated. | - | 5 | https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/artificial-intelligence/openais-sam-altman-discusses-gpt-5-release-date/ |
| The intense competition and rapid pace of innovation make it difficult for any single company to maintain a lead for long. | - | 4 | https://www.reuters.com/business/zuckerbergs-meta-superintelligence-labs-poaches-top-ai-talent-silicon-valley-2025-07-08/ |
| The open-source community, with models like DeepSeek, could produce a surprise top performer. | - | 2 | https://www.forbes.com/sites/markminevich/2025/02/06/the-6-million-ai-bombshell-how-deepseek-shook-wall-street-and-ai-leadership/ |

## Synthesis and Analysis
The AI landscape is incredibly dynamic, with several major players vying for dominance. While Google currently holds the top spot with Gemini 2.5 Pro, the lead is tenuous. The imminent releases of OpenAI's GPT-5 and xAI's Grok 4 are expected to significantly shift the rankings. xAI's massive funding and rapid progress make it a serious contender, but it faces stiff competition from the established research powerhouses of Google and OpenAI. The intense 'talent war' further complicates the picture, as the movement of key researchers can have a significant impact on a company's trajectory. While open-source models are improving rapidly, it is still more likely that a well-funded, proprietary model will hold the top spot.

## Key Assumptions
| Assumption |
|---|
| Grok 4 will be released before the end of July 2025 and will represent a significant improvement over Grok 3. |
| GPT-5 will be released in the summer of 2025, as anticipated, and will be a strong competitor. |
| The Chatbot Arena Leaderboard will remain a reliable and respected benchmark for model performance. |
| No other company will release a surprise, game-changing model that leapfrogs the current leaders. |

## Review and Iterate
The research has covered the major players and the key factors influencing the outcome. The main uncertainty lies in the exact release dates and performance of the next generation of models. The forecast is based on the current trajectory and public announcements, but delays or unexpected breakthroughs could significantly alter the outcome.

## Calibration Reflection
### Initial Probability
0.25

### Base-Rate Sanity
The base rate of any single company having the top model is low, given the number of serious competitors. However, xAI is a strong contender with significant resources and a clear focus on this goal. A slight downward adjustment is warranted to account for the strength of the competition.

### Tail-Probability Sanity
The probability of xAI having the best model is not a tail event, as they are one of the top contenders. The probability should not be extremely low.

### Over/Under-Confidence Check
I may be slightly overconfident in xAI's ability to execute, given their relatively short history. However, the massive funding and the track record of Elon Musk in other ventures provide some justification for this confidence. I will make a small downward adjustment to account for this potential bias.

## Final Probability
<answer>0.22</answer>


<question>Will Trump release more Epstein files before August? This question will resolve to "Yes" if the Trump Administration (including any federal court) publicly releases any files pertaining to the illegal activities of Jeffrey Epstein, which weren’t previously public, by July 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this question will resolve to "No".</question>

<date>2025-07-10</date>

## Fact Bank
- On July 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI released a two-page memo stating they concluded an "exhaustive review" of Jeffrey Epstein's files, found no evidence of a "client list," and reaffirmed his death by suicide. [https://www.npr.org/2025/07/07/g-s1-76367/doj-jeffrey-epstein-memo]
- The July 7, 2025, DOJ memo explicitly states, "This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.' There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions," and that no evidence was uncovered to "predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties." [https://www.npr.org/2025/07/07/g-s1-76367/doj-jeffrey-epstein-memo]
- The DOJ memo also indicated that "no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted" regarding the Epstein materials. [https://www.npr.org/2025/07/07/g-s1-76367/doj-jeffrey-epstein-memo]
- On July 8, 2025, top House Democrats, led by Jamie Raskin, formally demanded that the DOJ release all documents from Epstein's case that mention or reference Donald Trump, accusing AG Pam Bondi of withholding files to protect Trump. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/08/house-democrats-epstein-files-trump]
- The House Democrats' demand was partly prompted by a since-deleted June 2025 X post from Elon Musk, who claimed, "Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public." [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/08/house-democrats-epstein-files-trump]
- Attorney General Pam Bondi had previously "hyped up" the Epstein materials, promising damaging details and claiming to possess an "Epstein client list," but an initial release contained "no new information." [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/08/house-democrats-epstein-files-trump]
- A court order in the case *Miami Herald Media Company v. Department of Justice* mandates the DOJ to review and potentially release FBI and DOJ records related to Jeffrey Epstein. [https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it-is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/]
- The DOJ informed the federal court that it is actively reviewing millions of pages of FBI and DOJ records related to Epstein for potential public release, with releases expected on a "rolling basis." [https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it-is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/]
- The DOJ anticipates significant redactions in any released documents due to privacy concerns (victims, witnesses), ongoing investigations, law enforcement techniques, and national security. [https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it.is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/]
- Judicial Watch sued the DOJ and FBI in April 2025 for failing to adequately respond to three separate FOIA requests for Epstein-related records. [https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it-is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/]

## Reasoning Matrix
| Claim | Direction | Strength | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DOJ/FBI memo states no further disclosure is warranted. | - | 5 | [NPR](https://www.npr.org/2025/07/07/g-s1-76367/doj-jeffrey-epstein-memo) |
| DOJ anticipates significant redactions in any future releases. | - | 4 | [Texas Border Business](https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it.is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/) |
| House Democrats' demand for Trump-related files is unlikely to be answered. | - | 3 | [The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/08/house-democrats-epstein-files-trump) |
| AG Bondi's previous statements about a "client list" were contradicted by the recent DOJ memo. | - | 4 | [The Guardian](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/08/house-democrats-epstein-files-trump) |
| Court order mandates DOJ review and potential release of files. | + | 5 | [Texas Border Business](https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it.is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/) |
| DOJ is actively reviewing millions of pages for potential release on a "rolling basis." | + | 4 | [Texas Border Business](https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it.is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/) |
| Judicial Watch lawsuit seeks release of records. | + | 3 | [Texas Border Business](https://texasborderbusiness.com/justice-department-reports-to-court-it.is-reviewing-fbi-doj-epstein-records-for-possible-release/)

## Synthesis and Analysis
The question asks whether the "Trump Administration (including any federal court)" will release more Epstein files before August 2025. This broad definition is critical, as it includes actions by federal courts, which can compel releases independently of the executive branch.

The most recent development is the July 7, 2025, DOJ/FBI memo, which explicitly states that no "client list" exists and that "no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted." This statement from the executive branch, currently under the Trump Administration, strongly suggests a reluctance to release new information. Furthermore, it directly contradicts previous public statements by Attorney General Pam Bondi, who had previously hinted at more significant disclosures. The House Democrats' recent demand for Trump-related files is unlikely to yield results given their minority status.

However, the existence of ongoing legal actions, particularly the *Miami Herald Media Company v. Department of Justice* lawsuit, introduces a significant counter-force. This court order *mandates* the DOJ to review and potentially release FBI and DOJ records related to Epstein. The DOJ has acknowledged this and is actively reviewing millions of pages, with releases expected on a "rolling basis." While the DOJ anticipates significant redactions, the fact that a federal court has ordered a review and potential release means that the possibility of new, previously unpublicized information emerging from this process cannot be dismissed. The Judicial Watch lawsuit also adds pressure for disclosure, though its direct impact on a July 2025 release is less clear than the Miami Herald case.

The key tension lies between the executive branch's stated position of no further disclosure and the judicial branch's mandate for review and potential release. The question specifies "any federal court," which means a court-ordered release would satisfy the "Yes" condition. Given the volume of documents under review (millions of pages) and the "rolling basis" of potential releases, it is plausible that some previously unpublicized files, even if heavily redacted, could be released before August 2025 as a result of the court order. The definition of "previously public" is also important; even heavily redacted documents could contain new, albeit limited, information.

The "Trump Administration" aspect is complex. While the executive branch (DOJ) has stated no further disclosure, the federal courts are also part of the "Trump Administration" in the context of this question. Therefore, a court-ordered release, even if the executive branch is resistant, would count.

## Key Assumptions
- The federal court order in *Miami Herald Media Company v. Department of Justice* will continue to compel the DOJ to review and release documents, even if heavily redacted.
- The "rolling basis" of releases from the Miami Herald lawsuit could result in some new, previously unpublicized information being released before August 2025.
- The definition of "previously public" is broad enough to include heavily redacted documents that contain any new information.

## Review and Iterate
I have reviewed the information and my analysis. The critical uncertainty remains the timing and nature of the "rolling basis" releases from the Miami Herald lawsuit. While the DOJ has stated no further disclosure is warranted, the court order overrides this. The question hinges on whether any *new* information, however small or redacted, emerges from this court-mandated process by July 31, 2025. I believe I have sufficient information to make a forecast.

## Calibration Reflection
### Initial Probability
0.35

### Base-Rate Sanity
Historically, high-profile cases with significant public interest often see continued legal challenges and incremental releases of information, even if heavily redacted. The base rate for complete suppression of information under court order is low. However, the base rate for *significant* new, unredacted information being released in such a short timeframe, especially when the executive branch is resistant, is also low. The current political climate and the DOJ's recent memo also suggest a lower base rate for voluntary releases. I will adjust slightly downwards due to the strong statement from the DOJ.

### Tail-Probability Sanity
The probability is not at an extreme tail. A 0% probability would imply absolute certainty that no federal court will compel any release, and that no new information, however minor, will emerge from the ongoing review. A 100% probability would imply absolute certainty of a release of *new* information, which is highly unlikely given the DOJ's stance and the likelihood of heavy redactions. The current probability reflects the tension between the court order and the executive branch's resistance.

### Over/Under-Confidence Check
I feel reasonably confident in this range. The conflicting pressures (court order vs. executive resistance) make a definitive "Yes" or "No" difficult, and a probabilistic approach is appropriate. The key is the "any federal court" clause and the ongoing court-mandated review. The "previously public" clause also allows for even minor, newly revealed details to count. I will slightly increase the probability due to the ongoing court-mandated review and the "rolling basis" of potential releases, even if heavily redacted.


## Final Probability
<answer>0.40</answer>

Reverie Labs

See and act on the Future sooner with Superintelligence

Latest Forecasts

What's the probability that xAI has the best AI model in the world end of July?

Will Trump release more Epstein files before August?

Israel x Hamas ceasefire by July 15?

Will any rationalist, effective altruist, or AI safety researcher go on the Joe Rogan Experience before 2026?

Our Mission